11/15/2014 at 15:59 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I want to dislike this Shelby GT 500 conversion by !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! but this convertible actually doesn't look that bad, unlike their other products: the GT 500 and '69 fastbacks.
![]() 11/15/2014 at 16:00 |
|
If this is not bad compared to their other products I am seriously concerned.
![]() 11/15/2014 at 16:02 |
|
![]() 11/15/2014 at 16:05 |
|
How awful are the otheir other products if this is good compared to them?
![]() 11/15/2014 at 16:12 |
|
I've only ever made one exception when it comes to restomods. This will not be a second exception.
11/15/2014 at 16:13 |
|
This awful:
![]() 11/15/2014 at 16:14 |
|
....It looks wrong
![]() 11/15/2014 at 16:21 |
|
I like the orange one the best out of the three. All of it works together, to me. The blue and red ones are just awkward. And the side scoops on both of them seem like hastily added afterthoughts.
![]() 11/15/2014 at 16:30 |
|
Belt line is way too high. The ass is so fat, it looks like it's collapsing the rear suspension. Those taillights, which dominate the rear fascia of the '69-70, are lost in a sea of plump.
It's terrible.
11/15/2014 at 16:34 |
|
Yup the side scoops don't do any good to their looks. I think the b-pillar looks awkward on both fastbacks and those rear lights aren't very good looking on the Boss.
![]() 11/15/2014 at 17:10 |
|
these are built 20min from my school
![]() 11/15/2014 at 17:11 |
|
they are better in person
![]() 11/15/2014 at 17:17 |
|
How bad are the other ones? I'm sorry, but that one doesn't look right at all, imo.
![]() 11/15/2014 at 18:21 |
|
That looks awful. Poor Mustangs. Poor everybody's sensibilities.
![]() 11/15/2014 at 19:03 |
|
I've seen one in person, and overall I like it. It has some odd views from some angles but very nice from some others.